IRs and DARs should be based on what?

IRs and DARs should be based on what?

• A. Personal opinions
• B. Rumors
• C. Articulable facts
• D. Inmate's request

Answer: (C)

IRs and DARs should be based on articulable facts—details you can clearly describe and back up with evidence. That means sticking to what you observed, what was documented, and statements from reliable sources that can be verified. A solid report records who was involved, what happened, where and when it occurred, and how it was handled, along with any evidence or witnesses. It separates what you directly observed from interpretations or opinions, avoiding speculation. If you include statements from others, note who said them and how reliable they are, and clearly distinguish observed actions from inferences. Inmate requests or rumors aren’t the basis for the report unless they relate to the event and can be corroborated; the report should reflect what actually occurred and what can be proven. Using articulable facts keeps the report credible, admissible, and useful for investigations and administrative actions.

IRs and DARs should be based on articulable facts—details you can clearly describe and back up with evidence. That means sticking to what you observed, what was documented, and statements from reliable sources that can be verified. A solid report records who was involved, what happened, where and when it occurred, and how it was handled, along with any evidence or witnesses. It separates what you directly observed from interpretations or opinions, avoiding speculation. If you include statements from others, note who said them and how reliable they are, and clearly distinguish observed actions from inferences. Inmate requests or rumors aren’t the basis for the report unless they relate to the event and can be corroborated; the report should reflect what actually occurred and what can be proven. Using articulable facts keeps the report credible, admissible, and useful for investigations and administrative actions.